DataFab //  artificial proprietary intelligence T+00:00:00 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · SOC 2 Type II — certified Raw egress  0 B 

DataFab  /  Industries

Where it is proven

Six regulated estates, examined.

The beachhead is deliberately the estates where the data cannot move, the work is regulated and repetitive, and every decision must survive an inspector, a court or an oversight body. If it holds there, it holds anywhere.

Regulated by defaultAir-gap deployableEvidence produced as the work happens

01 · banking & financial services

Financial crime & compliance

The unit sees fragments. DataFab unifies every source in place, derives the schema and ontology, and assembles a dynamic knowledge graph of customers, counterparties and money flow. Governed agencies then run over it — from detection to defensible narrative.

Because the graph already knows what an entity is, rules express intent rather than brittle joins. “Funds in from a high-risk counterparty, out within 24 hours” is written against meaning. Change a threshold, replay history, see the effect — before it reaches production.

Unify

Connect everything, move nothing

Core banking, payments, CRM, screening, trade finance, documents, warehouses and streams — read in place, resolved on the way back.

Resolve

Twelve copies, one customer

Ownership chains, beneficial owners and counterparties become traversable structure rather than rows to reconcile by hand.

Reason

Agencies over the graph

Monitoring, screening, triage, investigation, narrative and quality — each at the autonomy its risk allows.

Defend

When the regulator asks why

The answer is the artefact, not a reconstruction: every statement cited, every disposition logged, every decision replayable under the rules in force at the time.

02 · defence & intelligence

Every source. Every warning. Nothing leaves.

The hardest failures in this mission are not failures of collection. The signal is usually already there, in fragments, across disciplines, discounted at a single desk. DataFab draws every source you already hold into one governed picture, tests it continuously against the threats you are watching for, and forces what matters into a warning that cannot quietly disappear. All of it inside your enclave.

Difference 01

Nothing leaves

The picture is real; the data movement is zero. Every source read in place and resolved inside your enclave — the one all-source capability you can actually run on classified ground.

Difference 02

The warning that cannot be buried

Weak signals are scored continuously across the estate and accumulate into an institutional warning that resurfaces on new evidence. It cannot die inside one analyst’s judgement, a silo, or a prevailing assumption.

Difference 03

A virtual team, commanded by dialogue

One analyst directs a governed team of specialists that does the enormous, complex work — in conversation, not queries. The reach of a unit, from a single seat.

The floor — assumed, native, present on day one

Link analysisWatchlist & sanctions screeningAll-source fusionEntity resolutionTemporal analysisGeospatialPattern of lifeNetwork analysisCase managementReporting & dissemination

Institutional de-biasing

An analyst defines a future threat hypothesis. The system decomposes it into observable indicators, tests the agency’s entire internal and external estate against it continuously, accumulates corroborating evidence across disciplines, preserves the contradictions, maintains the hypothesis over time, and escalates it into an institutional warning.

A warning should not disappear because one person does not believe it.

The system does not remove human judgement — it removes the ability for important evidence to disappear inside it

Contradictions preserved

Evidence for and against is kept, so the assessment stays honest rather than one-sided.

Confidence over time

The score is not fixed at one assessment. It moves as evidence arrives, up or down.

Institutional escalation

At the threshold it becomes an agency-level object demanding acknowledgement, escalation, or an explicit decision not to act.

Resurfaces

New signal reopens it, and a more senior person must disposition it again. It cannot quietly die.

Horizon scanning

Most tools react to known threats. A researcher defines a new scenario, risk or typology and reverse-engineers it into the smaller, observable indicators that would signal it — and the system then watches for them across every source, measuring every new piece of data and every new ontology concept against every live scenario.

Each indicator is answered with policy before a byte is collected: which source holds it, its credibility, the authorisation required to task it, its format and frequency, and whether the data is already within reach. New scenarios, sources, concepts and typologies fold back into the semantic layer — the system extends its own reach.

Analyst dialogue — illustrativeevery action gated & logged
You

Map everyone linked to vessel MV Orwell across the last 90 days.

DataFab

Resolving across signals, port registries and open sources — 47 entities, 6 relationships. 3 uncertain matches flagged for your review. The imagery pull needs your authorisation before I task it.

You

Approve the imagery. Prioritise the financial links.

DataFab

Imagery tasked and logged to you. Two front companies share a beneficial owner at confidence 0.91. Building the network now, and I will watch for new movement while you read. illustrative dialogue · every agent inherits your clearance and acts only on what you may see

Deployment

Air-gapped

Full functionality inside an isolated network; agent-based and outbound-only where a boundary is crossed at all.

Deployment

On-premises

Inside your data centre, reading in place to the systems you already run.

Deployment

Sovereign cloud

Your accredited environment, your keys, your jurisdiction.

Deployment

Tactical edge

Deployable forward and disconnected — the picture travels, and the guarantees travel with it.

03 · insurance

Claim handling, finished.

Extraction stops at the start. Tagging a claim for a small per-case fee is worth exactly that, because extraction alone cannot finish a written claim — and a manually-settled case costs a large multiple of the extraction fee, fully loaded.

The value is not the extraction slice. It is the fallout pool. Every claim moved from manual to straight-through removes a manual case, and the right measure of any solution is one number: how far it shrinks the fallout rate.

ScenarioFallout falls toStraight-through rises toManual workload removed
Conservative45%55%−31%
Base case35%65%−46%
Ambitious25%75%−62%

Illustrative model output from a worked example, against a 65% starting fallout rate. Not a quote, and not a measured result — real figures are set per engagement against your case mix and volumes.

Read-only

In place, nothing copied out

The claims decisioning core is adapted, not replaced. Data stays in the policy administration system, the intake channel and the document store.

Calibrated

Confidence per step

One confidence per decision, many per claim, rolled up on the case — not one number for the whole document.

Grounded

Source per statement

A caseworker can verify any statement in seconds; an auditor can replay any decision end to end.

Closed loop

Missing information handled

Reach-out is drafted, the response re-enters through intake, and the case re-evaluates automatically — no manual re-keying.

05 · consumer redress

Remediation at population scale.

A redress programme is a data problem wearing a legal deadline. The affected population has to be identified across systems that disagree, the calculation has to be deterministic and reproducible, the outreach has to happen at volume, and the whole thing has to be defensible on the day it is delivered.

01

Cohorting

Affected populations identified across the estate, with the basis for inclusion recorded per customer.

02

Calculation

Redress computed deterministically — fixed steps, reproducible, no model discretion in the flow.

03

Outreach

AutoFab runs contact at volume, with the record of every attempt and every response attached to the case.

04

Packaging

Audit-ready output produced as the work happens, rather than reconstructed against a deadline.

06 · government & public bodies

A record that survives scrutiny.

The hardest question in public-sector casework is not what the system found. It is whether you can defend how you found it. Every judgement carries its evidence, its authority and its lineage, so the finished assessment and the record behind it are the same artefact.

Authority

Tiered approval

Sensitive requests clear at higher authority. Access is denied without it — and the denial is logged too.

Coordination

Deconfliction

Requests are checked against live and historical casework, so one team never blindly steps on another.

Judgement

Overlap detection

When two records share an entity or a location, the evidence is presented side by side and a person decides: merge, or keep separate.

Assurance

Oversight-ready

Who saw what, who decided, on what evidence, and when — recorded as it happened rather than reconstructed after the fact.

Next step

Bring the workflow that has to hold up.

The first engagement is one urgent use case and a handful of critical sources, deployed where the data already lives — cloud, private cloud, on-premises or air-gapped.